Peace and conflict sensitivity are inextricably linked to environmental policy.

We cannot sustain a healthy planet or achieve prosperity for all without inclusive and just peace, recognising that inequitable natural resource management and environmental damage can fuel conflict and division. Environmental policy should be aware of how it interacts with local contexts and potential contributions to, or causes of, conflict, seeking to be conflict sensitive and to purposefully promote equitable collaboration on natural resource and environment issues. International funding and climate finance flows should meaningfully factor in context-specific peace and security factors in order to quantify and capture peace co-benefits.

A group of 18 organizations and more than 40 individuals collaborated throughout 2021 and 2022 to bring peace & security into focus at Stockholm+50. References to peace and conflict prevention in the various outcome documents of Stockholm+50 represent a marked difference and turning point in the global discussion on sustainable development.

Read more about peace at Stockholm, including policy outcomes, here.

The community welcomes the building momentum around peace and conflict sensitivity within environment and climate change policy.

Stay in touch with us by filling in this form.

Our ecosystem

Explore the Peace@Stockholm+50 blog series:

Peace and conflict sensitivity are inextricably linked to environmental policy because:

  • The environment and policies around it can fuel conflict.

  • Damage from conflict has a significant negative impact on the natural environment.

  • Cooperation to respond to climate change and manage natural resources can contribute to building peace.

  • A just transition and prosperity for all is realised by enhancing peace.

  • Responding to environmental and climate challenges requires an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach.


Stockholm+50 presents an opportunity for policy actors to build political coalitions and take practical action on initiatives that address environmental challenges while also promoting peaceful coexistence and equitable natural resource management.

The following recommendations provide practical ways to achieve this, including:

Building conflict sensitivity into policy:

  • Analysing, preventing, and mitigating the conflict implications of global environmental, nature conservation, and climate finance policy decisions.

  • Identifying environmental entry points for enhancing peace.

  • Allocating resources to staff capacities and organisational practices that allow governments, multilateral agencies, non-government environmental organisations, and business actors to meaningfully integrate conflict and peace issues into their environmental, conservation, and climate finance work.

  • Developing and adopting funding criteria, financial norms, and guidelines which require and facilitate the integration of peacebuilding or conflict sensitivity perspectives.

Building interdisciplinary collaboration: 

  • Supporting initiatives that share learning, research and practical tools on how to integrate peace and conflict issues into environmental, nature conservation, and climate finance action.

  • Relationship building among climate finance and peace and security stakeholders towards defining best practices and building financial pipelines that generate and capture peace dividends.

  • Adopting an inclusive approach to environmental policy formulation and delivery, promoting leadership from women, indigenous communities, youth, and other marginalised persons.

Ecosystem for Peace Art

Stockholm+50